Judgment[1998] KEHC 108
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
by the decision of the assessors. It has to re evaluate the evidence on its own and reach its own conclusion either agreeing or disagreeing with the assessors.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Civil Appeal 119 of 1995 SAMWEL MWAURA.............................................................. APPELLANT Versus JAMES MUCHIRI .............................................................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 75 OF 1993 PIUS KABUNGA……….....…………APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 250 OF 1993 JOHN MWOBOBIA ……...........................…..APPELLANT VERSUS CHILDREN OFFICER MERU……............…..RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in P&D No 7 of 1992 of DM II’s Court at Meru)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
For the above reasons I allow this appeal, set aside the judgment and orders of the court below and order that the matter be re-tried by a magistrate with requisite monetary jurisdiction either in Nyeri or Nairobi. I entertain no doubts that the parties who have shown a keen interest in the disposal of the matter shall intimate to the deputy registrar of this Court where they next want to be heard.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CIVIL SUIT NO. 23 OF 1992 D.M.AMAYAMU..............................................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS BENJAMIN K.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 87 OF 1994 WILLIAM MAKERE KENES...........................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC....................................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MERU CIVIL CASE NO 390 OF 1992(OS) KIBUNDI …………….…………….… PLAINTIFF VERSUS MUKOBWA & ANOTHER ….….... DEFENDANT RULING This is a preliminary question as to whether, by reason of the determination of the originating summons by the High Court, in the High Court Civil Case No 2411 of 1979 (OS), at Nairobi, the instant originating summons, which was also started at Nairobi but in due course was transferred here, is barred by the application of the doctrine of
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CIVIL SUIT NO 142 OF 1989 THOMAS NYAIBURU NYAKANGO ………….……. PLAINTIFF VERSUS DIAMOND TRUST OF KENYA LTD…………..… DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CIVIL APPEAL NO 11 OF 1992 SECURICOR COURIER (K) LTD………....…. APPELLANT VERSUS OWINO……………………………………..
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 176 OF 1992 JOSEPH KOECH YEGO …....…….…………. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…….………………………….… RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
There is no difficulty in complying with an order to that effect. It was a prayer for an order allowing the applicant to manifest her religion by doing a specific and clear act, namely, wearing her headscarf.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CIVIL CASE NO 61 OF 1991 GABRIEL NDUNGU KINUTHIA.........................APPLICANT VERSUS GEORGE W WAWERU................................RESPONDENT RULING On 27th December 1991, the plaintiff/applicant filed a suit against the defendant/respondent and claimed from him both general and special damages arising out of an accident which occurred on 16th June 1989 along Nyeri-Nyahururu Road in which the plaintiff/applicant sustained severe injur
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
have the ex-parte judgment set aside and in consequence all subsequent orders including the order appealed against are nullified. The appeal must be allowed.” It follows therefore, that the exparte judgment of 29th of April, 1991 was entered against the 2nd defendant/respondent, Mwika in error.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU Civil Case 215 of 1990 M’IKUNYUA IBARI STEPHEN KIJOGI IBARI………………………….PLAINTIFFS versus NKANATA M’IBARI……………...…....……..……DEFENDANT 28/1/91 Coram: SO Oguk – judge Plaintiff in person Defendant - absent Court Interpreter – Murungi
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL CASE NO 26 OF 1990 MURUNGI NKAMBI …. … PLAINTIFF versus DAVID M’ABURI … ….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CIVIL APPEAL NO 6 OF 1987 CHELELGO LIMO …………………………….... APPELLANT VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF LANDS…….………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
On the prepondrance of evidence before me as a whole, I cannot help reaching the inescapable conclusion on such evidence, that the 2nd Defendant was not an innocent purchaser for value of the shit land. I am satisfied that it has been established on a balance of probabilities that he was very much aware when he entered into a written agreement with the 1st Defendant (Exhibit A) on the 5th of October, 1987 for the purchase of the suit land that the said land had then been sold to the Plaintiff wh
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CIVIL APPEAL NO 4 OF 1988 C M S………………….....…..…. APPELLANT VERSUS S W S……..…………….……..