Judgment[1985] KECA 96
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…That is simply not good enough to establish an essential of the offence, and may, indeed, provide the reason why the prosecution elected to proceed on a charge of rape.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The principal state counsel indicated to me at the hearing of the appeal that he does not support the conviction because of material contradiction in the evidence for the prosecution.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The appellant however has taken the prosecution witnesses to task. He has pointed out carefully some discrepancies in their evidence.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Their petitions of appeal, filed on the July 23, 1984, each contained lengthy grounds, but in particular attacked their respective identifications by the prosecution witnesses, upon which of course, their convictions mainly…
Division and case type: CRIMINAL DIVISIONCriminal Appeal
…Their petitions of appeal, filed on the July 23, 1984, each contained lengthy grounds, but in particular attacked their respective identifications by the prosecution witnesses, upon which of course, their convictions mainly…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
…At the end of the trial the prosecution had called ten (10) witnesses while the accused had been heard in his defence.…
…That closed the prosecution case. The defence one opened. The accused on oath told this court that he came to the shop of PW9 on duty at 7.00 P.M. on 1st July 1996.…