Search court decisions

…So the prayers which were left were, firstly that the suit be struck out for being an abuse of the process of the court and for want of prosecution. An application under O.…

…In the above circumstances it is my view that the application for the dismissal of this suit for want of prosecution under O. XVI rule 5 is premature.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the accident was caused by the appellant in that he had driven at a high speed as well as on the wrong side of the road and also failed to brake in time to avoid hitting the deceased.…

…The prosecution of the appellant arose from an accident which occurred within Thika Municipality on 11.8.88.…

…He blamed the officer in charge Diani Police Station as having been instrumental in his arrest, beating and subsequent prosecution.…

…Having come to the foregoing conclusion, the tort of malicious prosecution must of necessity fail. There was justification for the arrest, detention and prosecution of the plaintiff.…

…Further the amount of money stolen did not belong to the Government of Kenya and as such the prosecution in the lower courts has failed to establish this fact.…

…The prosecution required to prove that the appellant was the one who played a part in dealing with certain documents to prove that he stole.…

…For our purpose here, the main complaint against the prosecution is non-compliance with (c), namely, failure by the prosecution to include certain documents, or exhibits in the committal bundles.…

…There is in the bundle a list of prosecution witnesses the prosecution intends to rely on and their addresses. We have included a list of exhibits and these number 301.…

…I suppose it is fair to say that, if the money was in dollars and the appellant was expected to exchange them on the black-market, it would be unlikely that the prosecution witnesses would say so.…

…There was some substance in the account of the appellant which was to be negatived by the prosecution. On the evidence available, the appellant always said that someone had taken the money.…

…Ogada is that the evidence of the prosecution witness was contradictory.…

…He submitted that the alleged contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses were minor and did not affect the conviction.…

…He submitted that the summing up by the Judge Advocate was one sided and concentrated mainly on the prosecution's case.…

…The prosecution demonstrated that the Applicant was recalled to Nanyuki Barracks because he did not have the qualifications to handle push up duties.…

…He submitted that the summing up by the Judge Advocate was one sided and concentrated mainly on the prosecution's case.…

…The prosecution demonstrated that the Applicant was recalled to Nanyuki Barracks because he did not have the qualifications to handle push up duties.…

…In this case, however, the second magistrate did not himself see and hear all the prosecution witnesses even though he said that he carefully “observed” the evidence given by the prosecution witnesses.…

…But even on the evidence itself it was the duty of the prosecution to prove the charge against the two appellants beyond any reasonable doubt and on the evidence brought by the prosecution I think that the appellants ought…

…It was the prosecution case that at the material time being 1 pm of 12th December, 1989 PW 1 who was the herdsboy for all the animals charged as robbed from him, took the herd and flock of sheep to water.…

…In the ultimate this Court is left in enormous doubt as to the quality of the prosecution evidence against the appellant.…

…Out of the seven witnesses called by the Prosecution to provetheir case, only two were presented as eye witnesses to whattranspired on that fateful day.…

…The Prosecution says the heavy object was the hoe handle whichonly Maria, P.W.3 saw and said it was used. One week later shegave it to Pc Alugongo who produced it as an exhibit.…

…Out of the seven witnesses called by the Prosecution to provetheir case, only two were presented as eye witnesses to whattranspired on that fateful day.…

…The Prosecution says the heavy object was the hoe handle whichonly Maria, P.W.3 saw and said it was used. One week later shegave it to Pc Alugongo who produced it as an exhibit.…

…At the close of the prosecution case the evidence presented can be summarized as follows: The deceased and P.W.1 Johnson Kamau (Kamau) had been given Kshs.5,000/= by their employer, P.W.2, Francis Karanja Mwai (Karanja) to…

…At the close of the prosecution case, the court must consider the above evidence in order to determine whether or not it discloses a prima facie case against the two accused persons.…

…It is of course the duty of the prosecution to prove the case against the accused in accordance with Section 45(2) of the Penal Code and beyond reasonable doubt.…

…It is also the duty of the prosecution to prove the criminal intent of the accused person, that is, the intent to overthrow by unlawful means of the Government and the prosecution must also prove the overt acts being the…

…is founded upon the Constitution and a challenge to this authority must be direct and can only be dealt with in the High Court. (8) The conduct of criminal prosecutions is always a matter of public interest; therefore the…

…The above holding may be the correct exposition of the law but again that court decided as follows:- “Suppose the Attorney General, while conducting a prosecution that to all right-thinking people ought to be pursed, abruptly…

…The defendant seeks an order for the dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution.…

…The third defendant has sufficiently proved that the action as against him ought to be dismissed for want of prosecution.…

…It is accepted that in an action for malicious prosecution the plaintiff cannot succeed unless he establishes the following essential ingredients of the tort known as malicious prosecution.…

…Was the alleged arrest and imprisonment of the plaintiff unlawful and the prosecution that followed malicious?…

…For the prosecution case to succeed, it was incumbent upon the prosecution to prove that each and every averment of fact contained in the affidavit of the appellant complained of was false and in particular as regards of…

…When the trial magistrate find that there was no clear evidence asto the falsely in his affidavit then that was sufficient to entitle the appellant to be acquitted as the onus was on the prosecution to prove its case beyond…