Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsElection Petition
…(ix) Rule 29 of the Elections (Parliamentary and county Election)Petition Rules, 2017 provides thus: 1) the parties to the proceedings may apply for scrutiny of the votes for purposes of establishing the valid votes cast…
…Rule 29 of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2017 provides as follows:- "Scrutiny of votes (1) The parties to the proceedings may apply for scrutiny of the votes for purposes of establishing…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…Nowhere in the proceedings before the clan members under the area Asst Chief did Nkonge come up to say that he witnessed the defendant giving the plaintiff some Shs 1,500/-.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…In interlocutory proceedings such as the present one, however, statements as to a deponent’s information or belief are admitted, provided the sources and grounds thereof are stated.…
…Although in interlocutory proceedings an affidavit may contain statements as to the deponent’s information or belief if the source of the information and grounds of believe are stated (see order 18, rule 3(1) of our Civil…
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
…the provisions of Rule 63 of the Probate and Administration Rules, which clearly states the following provisions of Civil Procedure Rules, namely Order V,X,XI,XV,XVII,XXV,XLIV, and XLIX shall apply for far as relevant to proceedings…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The learned magistrate should have firmly resisted the request for ex-parte orders so as to streamline the proceedings.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…According to the records of the arbitrator filed in court for what it is worth, the 1st Defendant is recorded to have stated as follows in page 5 of the proceedings- "In September, 1987, I saw the 2nd Defendant who wanted…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The mischief against which all limitation Acts are directed is delay in commencing legal proceedings; for delay may lead to injustice, particularly where the ascertainment of the relevant facts depend on oral testimony.…