Search court decisions

…As to the prayer for stay of execution and release of attached property that is to feature alongside a similar prayer in the second application of 13th November, 1995.In this application Mrs. Nzei argued that Mr. F. M.…

…So what is the fate of the applications herein or indeed the whole proceedings in the lower court in P.M.C.C.NO. 303/95? It is not in dispute that Mr.…

…As to the prayer for stay of execution and release of attached property that is to feature alongside a similar prayer in the second application of 13th November, 1995.In this application Mrs. Nzei argued that Mr. F. M.…

…So what is the fate of the applications herein or indeed the whole proceedings in the lower court in P.M.C.C.NO. 303/95? It is not in dispute that Mr.…

…The appellant applied that this judgment be set aside but the learned Resident Magistrate dismissed the application on 17th March 1992, hence the present appeal.…

…That this act amounted to negligence on his part to warrant the dismissal of the application to set aside ex-parte judgment.…

…Both applications were heard together with a view to give a composite ruling. Mr.…

…It was not in doubt or disputed that when the Respondents filed their first application to set aside the award on or about 1st April 1998 30 days had long expired after the award was read on 22nd January 1998, The fresh application…

…On the defendant’s application the court ordered the plaintiff on June 7, 1982 to supply the particulars asked for in the prescribed form No 15, Appendix B of the Civil Procedure Rules, within seventy days.…

…The court made the order asked for and the plaintiff’s suit was dismissed even though the particulars had been supplied before the hearing date of the defendant’s application, and notwithstanding also the plaintiff’s offer…

…Even though the defendants were served and an Affidavit of service duly filed, they neither filed any responses nor attended court to oppose the application.…

…The consequence is that the application was thus deemed unopposed and was ordered to be heard in the absence of the Defendants/respondents. 4.…

…Even though the defendants were served and an Affidavit of service duly filed, they neither filed any responses nor attended court to oppose the application.…

…The consequence is that the application was thus deemed unopposed and was ordered to be heard in the absence of the Defendants/respondents. 4.…

…Let it also be borne in mind, what the limits of the application were. Section 28(1) of the Act (cap 22) permits an ex parte application to be made.…

…Sec. 28(2) provides: “(2) Where such an application is made before the commencement of a relevant action, the court shall grant leave in respect of any cause of action to which the application relates; if, but only if, on…

…has an oversight jurisdiction over the exercise of the Attorney General’s power to terminate criminal prosecutions. (6) The Attorney General’s exercise of discretion to terminate proceedings can only be challenged by an application…

…The private prosecutor will be required to first make an application before the High Court challenging the exercise of the Attorney General discretion. (10) The Constitution section 26 (8) guarantees the Independence of the…

…Accordingly they applied under the priviso to that section for the admission of their respective appeals out of time by applications dated July 19, 1984.…

…Their applications came before Bhandari, J, on the August 23, 1984, on which occasion it was stated that the appellants were absent and unrepresented, and that Mr Metho appeared for the Republic, as he did in this Court.…

…Accordingly they applied under the priviso to that section for the admission of their respective appeals out of time by applications dated July 19, 1984.…

…Their applications came before Bhandari, J, on the August 23, 1984, on which occasion it was stated that the appellants were absent and unrepresented, and that Mr Metho appeared for the Republic, as he did in this Court.…

…The Plaintiff’s Advocate opposed the application for adjournment and the Court agreed with her that because the Defendant’s Advocate had had ample opportunity to withdraw, he had not done so and was not entitled to an adjournment…

…But the question cannot be determined by the application of any rigid rules. Each case must be considered according to its facts.…

…That, unfortunately, is not an end of the matter because there remains the vexed question of the motor vehicle KWL 653, which was the subject of an application by the republic before the Chief Justice on February 17, 1986…

…AFC maintained that the plaintiff, that is, the appellant, was its “loanee”, that the appellant was in default and that the AFC was fully justified in seizing the pick-up, and (in the Notice of Objection to the injunction application…