Search court decisions

…on a balance of probability a causal link between someone’s negligence and his injury 22.…

…He has cited the case of on contributory negligence, the court in Chemengen v Cheptot (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Mecca Jepkemei Too) [2022] KEHC 9902 (KLR) where the subject of contributory negligence…

…He also pleaded negligence on the part of the deceased. 4.…

…The Court of Appeal in Nandwa -vs- Kenya Kazi Ltd [1988] KLR 488 considering the issue negligence held that: “In an action for negligence, the burden is always on the plaintiff to prove that the accident was caused by the…

…The appellant blamed the respondent for negligence and causing the accident. The appellant therefore sought compensation against the respondent for the damage and loss to his vehicle in the sum of KShs 169,880/=.…

…Negligence can be proved notwithstanding the fact that the accident in question was never reported to the police since there is no nexus between a report of an accident to the police with proof of negligence.…

…According to learned counsel, this means that in accident cases, a conviction implies negligence on the part of the person convicted hence that person cannot deny negligence or otherwise assert that he is completely blameless…

…It was therefore premature to come to the conclusion that not even prima facie case of contributory negligence could be established.…

…The appellant thus sued the respondent alleging breach of contract of banker and customer relationship and negligence in handling her account.…

…It outlined the alleged particulars of the appellant’s negligence. 17.…

…He further pleaded negligence and contribution on the part of the deceased.…

…Learned counsel submitted that the appellant failed to prove negligence on the part of the respondents even as their pleadings remained unsupported by evidence.…

…He further pleaded negligence and contribution on the part of the deceased as well as the driver of the vehicle in which the deceased was travelling. 6.…

…He also found that there was no contributory negligence against the 1st respondent. 17. The appellant was dissatisfied with that decision and now appeals to this court on some 17 grounds.…

…He further pleaded negligence and contribution on the part of the deceased as well as the driver of the tuk tuk registration number KMAZ 268A. 6.…

…As such, the appellant enjoined the owner of the tuk tuk John Otieno who is the 2nd respondent herein, to the suit as a third party and as being vicariously liable for the negligence of the driver. 7.…

…In the alternative, he blamed the respondent for the accident contending that it was caused by a cooking stove that exploded and hence solely caused by the negligence of the respondent.…

…She bears contributory negligence.…

…The respondent blamed the appellant’s for negligence and causing the accident.…

…The appellant is not alleging contributory negligence against the respondent. His position is that a third party caused the accident.…

…They further pleaded negligence and contribution on the part of the deceased pleading that the deceased darted onto and across the highway without checking if the road was clear. 6.…

…The appellants pleaded that the deceased was lawfully walking off the road when the accident vehicle lost control and rammed into him and therefore attributed negligence on the part of the driver.…

…The evidence of CW 4, taken as it was, before considering the evidence of DW 1, was sufficient to prove negligence against the respondent.…

…It follows, as submitted by counsel for the appellant that, on his own evidence, the respondent was still culpable in negligence in the circumstances of the case. 40.…

…He blames the appellant for negligence and/or breach of duty for the said injuries. 27.…

…The statement of defence annexed to the supplementary affidavit alleges that the suit was time-barred for being filed out of time and also denies the negligence claimed against the appellant and alleges contributory negligence…

…The appellant blamed the respondent for negligence for the accident. 6.…

…The respondent on its part pleaded contributory negligence against the appellant and also the driver and owner of motor vehicle registration number KCQ 734G Nissan matatu.…

…It was the trial court’s finding that it was upon the plaintiff to prove the causal link between his injuries and the defendant’s negligence.…

…Further that there was no testimony that he drove the vehicle in an unsafe and dangerous manner as set out in the particulars of negligence.…

…The learned Adjudicator did not have jurisdiction to hear a personal injury claim arising from an accident where common law negligence is to be established. b.…

…Failure to do so, as was the case herein, would be an indication that he was not careful while driving or was distracted which in either case connotes negligence on his part. 51.…

…following grounds: a. that the trial magistrate erred in law and in fact in holding the appellants 100% liable for the accident despite the weighty evidence tendered before the court by the appellants which clearly established negligence…

…Learned counsel has cited the case of Philip Keipto Chemwolo & another v Augustine Kubende [1986] KECA 87 (KLR) where it was held that despite conviction for careless driving, the issue of contributory negligence may still…

…The 1st respondent blamed both drivers in negligence for the accident and further that the motor vehicle owners were vicariously liable for the same. 5.…

…They denied the 1st respondent’s claim and blamed the 1st respondent and the 2nd and 3rd respondents for negligence in causing the accident. 6.…

…The appeal seeks to set aside the decree arising from a judgment dated 7th November 2022 where the trial court found the appellant wholly liable in negligence for injuries sustained by the respondent following a road traffic…

…She therefore found the driver negligent in the circumstances and found the appellants wholly liable in negligence. 14.…