Judgment[2014] KESC 3
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
We have taken into account the weighty submissions made for the respondents, regarding the essential principle of compliance with Orders issuing from a Court of law, just as we have closely adverted to the applicants’ case for a proper interpretation of the constitutional status of County Assembly privileges, operating within the scheme of the separationofpowers doctrine. As it is clear to us that the respondents’ case rests on fundamental constitutional questions not yet interpreted, and which
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (CORAM: HANCOX CJ, NYARANGI JA, COCKAR Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 133 OF 1989 KIMURI……………………….. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………….RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nyeri, Abdullah J dated 22nd September 1989 in High Court Criminal Appeal No 96 of 1989)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (CORAM: HANCOX CJ, NYARANGI JA, COCKAR Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 133 OF 1989 KIMURI……………………….. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………….RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nyeri, Abdullah J dated 22nd September 1989 in High Court Criminal Appeal No 96 of 1989)