Search court decisions

…Application for summary judgment should not be allowed unless there are triable issues raised, in this case no triable issues raised, hence the lower court was correct in dismissing the application. Appeal dismissed.…

…Muslim Mohamed Jaffer Abdulla Kanji (the appellant) trades as ‘Airoquip & Applications’.…

…The Respondent followed up the payment with an application before court.…

…The Applicant made various applications before this court (Chemitei, J).…

…Even though the defendants were served and an Affidavit of service duly filed, they neither filed any responses nor attended court to oppose the application.…

…The consequence is that the application was thus deemed unopposed and was ordered to be heard in the absence of the Defendants/respondents. 4.…

…The applicant who was aggrieved by the said order then filed an application to this Court seeking to have the said orders revised.…

…He seeks to challenge the application on a number of grounds as shown in his chamber summons dated 26th of October, 1992. Those grounds are:- 1.…

…Accordingly they applied under the priviso to that section for the admission of their respective appeals out of time by applications dated July 19, 1984.…

…Their applications came before Bhandari, J, on the August 23, 1984, on which occasion it was stated that the appellants were absent and unrepresented, and that Mr Metho appeared for the Republic, as he did in this Court.…

…The appellant appealed to the superior court against both conviction and sentence and also filed an application under section 358 of the Criminal Procedure Code for leave to adduce additional evidence at the hearing of the…

…The application was filed on 23rd May, 1988. It was never heard.…

…In the matter of an application of Hetulla Properties Ltd and in the matter of a complaint by Electro Service Equipment Ltd and the Business Premises Rent Tribunal; and (d) As a result of these declarations the order of the…

…possession when he intends to demolish or reconstruct as in section 7(f) in cap 301] is ex hepothesi one in respect of which there is a subsisting tenancy, since sec 24(1) extends the current tenancy until the tenant’s application…

…against the weight of evidence and the judge is satisfied the evidence is sufficient and that there is no material raising a reasonable doubt that the conviction was right, he may summarily dismiss the appeal” And in that application…