Judgment[1984] KEHC 30
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…I suppose it is fair to say that, if the money was in dollars and the appellant was expected to exchange them on the black-market, it would be unlikely that the prosecution witnesses would say so.…
…There was some substance in the account of the appellant which was to be negatived by the prosecution. On the evidence available, the appellant always said that someone had taken the money.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…We have already said that the prosecution did not justify the detention.…
…the accused is confused, or there has been inordinate delay in bringing the accused to Court from the date of arrest, then an examination of the circumstances must form an integral part of the facts to be stated by the prosecution…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Upon a consideration of the evidence the trial magistrate believed the prosecution witnesses but not the evidence of the appellant or his witness or indeed the statutory statement of Makau Mulei and convicted the appellant…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Mr Owour also submitted that the identification of the applicants was based on the evidence of only one witness and that other persons who might have given material evidence were not called by the prosecution but that Court…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Their petitions of appeal, filed on the July 23, 1984, each contained lengthy grounds, but in particular attacked their respective identifications by the prosecution witnesses, upon which of course, their convictions mainly…