Court decisions & case law

Judgment[2019] KEHC 48618 December 2019

Judgment[1989] KECA 4816 November 1989

Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillian S" v Caltex Oil

Court of Appeal at MombasaAct,Bosire,JUDGE APPEAL,Inamdar,Alexander,Satchu,Kariuki,Saliarelis,Tsakiris,PLSCivil Appeal 50 of 1989

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

That evidence so far as it was adduced by the respondent fell foul of the requirements of rule 5 of Order 75: it failed to establish that the appellant was “the relevant “person”. The upshot of that is that the High Court did not have admiralty jurisdiction and the respondent was not entitled to invoke that jurisdiction.

Appeal allowedAllowed77 min read

Judgment[1989] KEHC 63 September 1989

In re Turtle Bay Hotels Limited [1989] KEHC 6 (KLR)

High Court at Nairobimaking ofCase number Winding Up Cause 36 of 1989

Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) WINDING UP CAUSE 36 OF 1989 IN THE MATTER OF TURTLE BAY HOTELS LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT RULING. By a Petition presented on 31st August, 1989 Fitzval Remedios Santana De Souza (herein after called the Applicant) has prayed for certain reliefs under Section 211 of the Companies Act and alternatively that the Company namely Turtle Bay Hotels Limited (herein after called the Company ) be wound

4 min read

Judgment[1988] KECA 5810 May 1988

Okong'o v Attorney-General & another

Court of Appeal at Kisumujudge High Court,Act,JUDGE APPEAL,WasunaCase number Civil Appeal 170 of 1986

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Platt, Apaloo JJA & Masime Ag JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 170 OF 1986 BETWEEN OKONG’O...........................................................................APPELLANT AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL & ANOTHER..............................RESPONDENT

Appeal refusedDismissed8 min read