Judgment[2002] KEHC 842
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Appeal
…The learned Magistrate did not accept the evidence of the appellant that the respondent was her causal worker. She thought this evidence was untrue.…
…Given the evidence the Magistrate heard and the statement the appellant made at Kasarani police station and which was admitted as evidence in the case, she was entitled to hold this view.…
Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Criminal Application
…affidavit of Inspector Mwaniki to see the allegations or instead of the magistrate allowing John Opiyo Arunga to read or to be told the contents of that affidavit and thereafter calling upon Inspector Mwaniki to adduce evidence…
…There was no evidence that by John Opiyo Arunga, the applicant, persuading people to join a party called FORD on an unknown date, if what Inspector Mwaniki said is true, he John Opiyo Arunga was likely to commit a breach…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…(They are neither facts nor new evidence) As they stand they are no more than mere allegations unsupported by evidence.…