Search court decisions

…Once more this court stated as follows: "Upon consideration of the matters deponed to in the supporting affidavit sworn by Wanjau, and in view of the fact that the respondent has been served and not complied with Order 50…

…The applicant's main ground for seeking review of the judgment and thereafter vacating judgment in issue were laid out in his affidavit in support of the application and they are mainly as follows: He had been let down by…

…In the affidavit in support of the application in case NAI 33 of 1983 (relating to the other applicant) Mr Wamae stated that it was this applicant’s failure to pass on the result of the case (of which Mr Wamae had informed…

…As Mr Gathuru says, the nature of the confusion which existed in the mind of the clerk was not specified in the affidavit of Mr Wamae, neither did the clerk himself swear an affidavit.…

…On May 10, 1979 the defendant’s advocate filed a summons for the setting aside of the ex parte judgment and filed an affidavit in support.…

…There is also an affidavit of the advocate briefed on behalf of the appellant dated July 25, 1979 for consideration.…

…In a subsequent affidavit sworn by Mr. Mohamed on 7th October, 2004, he admitted, as contended by Mr.…

…In response to the matters deponed to above, an affidavit in reply was sworn by a Manager of Aberdare, Mr.…

…A Photostat copy of that delivery note was annexed to the respondent’s affidavit in support of his application for summary judgment dated 10th March, 1992.…

…In its replying affidavit in opposition to the respondent’s application for summary judgment dated 18th March, 1992 the appellant denied having received this letter claiming that the initials on the delivery note did not…

…Among the objections taken before the judge was one to the effect that as the application by way of chamber summons was not supported by any affidavit, it would seem it was being contended by counsel for the respondent that…

…Mr Wasuna who also argued the application before the judge pointed out that they could not have filed a supporting affidavit because that was not allowed by order VI rule 13(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…counsel to specify the particular ground he relies on so as not to take the opponent by surprise we see no prejudice to the appellant in the superior court as the application was stated to be based on the grounds in the affidavit…

…of the applicant (respondent to this appeal) which affidavit (paragraph 3 thereof) referred to delay of fair trial of the action which ground falls under order V1 rule 13 (1) (c).…

…The respondent had sworn an affidavit in the superior court, the first four paragraphs whereof, were admitted by the appellant.…

…In paragraphs 3 and 4 of her said affidavit the respondent states that the appellant agreed to sell to her the suit property at a price of K.Shs.3,500,000/= 10% of which sum was to be paid as deposit in two stages; Shs.100,000…

…The material before the trial judge consisted of a short affidavit by the applicant exhibiting and verifying the contents of the originating summons.…

…By a replying affidavit the defendant depones inter alia, that the land in question is agricultural land and covered by the provisions of the Land Control Act.…

…In that regard, the 2nd plaintiff, who has sworn the affidavit in support of the application, depones that she and her husband were out of the country on the date the purported proclamation was made and there was therefore…

…In his affidavit, he acknowledges that he had to peep through the window in order to have a glimpse of the inside of the house.…

…On that application upon which the applicant did not file a replying affidavit, judgement was entered in terms of that application on 26th January 1988.…

…The defendant has to file a defence or an affidavit in answer to that claim. It is only then that Order 35 can apply for summary judgement where the defendant has entered appearance but has not filed a defence.…

…The company, according to its plaint and affidavits, imports a large amount of the raw materials for its business and to do this it has to use large amounts of foreign exchange.…

…It was supported by an affidavit of Mr Macharia. The material before the judge and his ruling were added.…

…The appellant explained the grounds of his absence in support of his application in the affidavits he swore on November 30, 1981, and April 13, 1983.…

…The first affidavit was in support of the application filed by DM Mareka, advocate, but withdrawn on March 3, 1983, and the second affidavit was in support of the renewed application which the appellant himself filed in April…

…There was no formal application supported by an affidavit as is required but at his request I agreed to hear the application for my disqualification.…

…For this purpose a copy of the Notice of Motion made in Civil Application No NAI 282 of 1998 filed on 31st January 2000 and a copy of Mr Deverell’s affidavit therein made were produced by consent.…

…There was no formal application supported by an affidavit as is required but at his request I agreed to hear the application for my disqualification.…

…For this purpose a copy of the Notice of Motion made in Civil Application No NAI 282 of 1998 filed on 31st January 2000 and a copy of Mr Deverell’s affidavit therein made were produced by consent.…

…The motion was supported by the Affidavit of the Applicant/plaintiff which essentially reiterated the grounds of the application by exhibiting the ruling Njoki J.…

…Even though the defendants were served and an Affidavit of service duly filed, they neither filed any responses nor attended court to oppose the application.…

…The Affidavit further deponed that the matters in dispute related to the termination of the agreement, delays the plaintiff, and, what if any, sums were due to the plaintiff.…

…The Managing Director of the plaintiff swore a replying affidavit in which he deponed that the matters in dispute set out in the plaint both in fact or law did not fall within the scope of the arbitration provision: that…

…In reserved rulings he observed that the pleadings as filed disclosed disputed facts and law which made the controversy so focused on such a diversity of questions going beyond affidavit materials and interlocutory arguments…

…That allegation, could not, as pointed out by the learned Judge, be rebutted by the affidavit evidence.Secondly, that the interest charged on the principal sum was not only unreasonable but also unconscionable and manifestly…

…In his ruling the learned judge was clearly conscious of the fact that the application then before him could not be decided on a consideration of the opposing affidavits, but that, having regard to those affidavits, it was…

…Mr Lakha began by referring to Mr Panesar’s affidavit of September 23 in which he specifically refuted the suggestion that Dynamics Engineering Ltd was ever intended to be run as a partnership.…