Search court decisions

…Section 83 of the Elections Act, 2011 is quite apt that non-compliance with the law should be such that it affected the results.…

…Section 83 of the Elections Act, 2011 is quite apt that non-compliance with the law should be such that it affected the results. That has not been established by the Applicant.…

…Section 83 of the Elections Act, 2011 is quite apt that non-compliance with the law should be such that it affected the results.…

…Section 83 of the Elections Act, 2011 is quite apt that non-compliance with the law should be such that it affected the results. That has not been established by the Applicant.…

…The Election Court held: “The provision contained in rule 4(3) that a petitioner personally sign the petition was mandatory and not merely discretionary and the petitioner’s non-compliance with it was fatal.” 13.…

…signed by him within the meaning of Sec 65 (2) (1) of the Act of 1932.; and Dennnig L J (expressing no view) said: “The name of the rm being the plainti’s professional name, his signature in the name of the rm was a compliance…

…It was Mr Inamdar’s submission before us that the adavit Mr Johnson Robert Kariuki sworn on 5th December, 1988, was manifestly defective for lack of compliance with the mandatory provisions of RSC 0.75 r 5 (4) and (9).…