Search court decisions

…The application is granted and the appeal is struck out as incompetent with costs to the respondent. The respondent will also have the costs of the motion. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 17th day of February, 1997.…

…out. (2)AND that the co sts of and incidental to this application as well as the Notice of Motion dated 12th November, 1997 of the Appellant and the Civil Appeal No. 160 of 1997 be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent…

…In the circumstance we allow the application and order that the Notice of Appeal filed herein on 13th July, 1994 and dated 11th July, 1994 be and is hereby struck out with costs for the applicant assessed at Shs.500/-, to…

…NO. 3065 OF 1996) **************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT This is an appeal from the order of the superior court (Kuloba, J.) given on February 6, 1997 whereby he struck out the five defendants from the suit on the ground…

…The application is granted and the appeal is struck out as incompetent with costs to the respondent. The respondent will also have the costs of the motion. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 17th day of February, 1997.…

…An appeal may be struck out under rule 80, above, on the ground that no appeal lies or that some essential step in the proceedings has not been taken within the prescribed time.…

…Prime facie, therefore, the appeal sought to be struck out was filed in time.…

…is an application under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules for extension of time to file a notice of appeal and an appeal out of time, the first appeal filed by the applicant (Civil Appeal No. 91 of 1993), having been struck…

…out by this Court on 25th October, 1995, because the record of appeal did not contain a certified copy of the decree as required by rule 85(1)(h) of the Court of Appeal Rules.…

…The applicant filed an appeal against that decision (Civil Appeal No.113/91), That appeal was struck out by the Court on 7th February, 1996, as the record of appeal did not contain a certified copy of the order appealed against…

…On the 27th February, 1990, the appellant filed a chamber summons under order VI rule 13(1)(a) of the Civil Procedure Rules praying for an order that: “The respondent/plaintiff’s suit be struck out as it discloses no reasonable…

…In those circumstances, the judge ought to have allowed the appellant’s chamber summons and struck out the plaint as disclosing no cause of action.…

…Rule 39(b) of the Rules of this Court provides that where an application for leave to appeal has in the first instance to be made to the superior court, it must first be considered and refused as opposed to being struck out…

…In the result the application succeeds and the appeal is hereby struck out as it is clearly incompetent. The respondents will have the costs of both the appeal and the motion.…

…Justice Shields) dated 17th day of July, 1996 in H.C.C.C NO. 2523 & 533 OF 1982) ********************* RULING OF THE COURT The present application seeks several orders namely that the appeal filed by the respondent be struck…

…out, that contain proceedings and orders of the superior court to set aside, that a Receiver appointed in respect of the applicant company do file proofs of debt and stay of proceedings.…

…been held, repeatedly, by this court that failure to include the formally drawn up decree or order embodying the decision of the court appealed form, is a matter going to jurisdiction and must result in the appeal being struck…

…out – see in particular JASWANTRAI AGGARWAL & ORS v LEKHRAJ AGGARWAL, Civil Appeal 3 of 1981.…

…On 19th September, 1997, his notice of appeal was struck out by this Court for the reason of his non-compliance with the order of the single judge of this Court dated 18th October, 1993 extending time by 30 days within which…

…On 19th September, 1997, his notice of appeal was struck out by this Court for the reason of his non-compliance with the order of the single judge of this Court dated 18th October, 1993 extending time by 30 days within which…

…************* RULING OF THE COURT By this application brought under rule 80 of the Rules of this Court, the applicant who is acting in person urges that the Notice of Appeal lodged in this court on 9th October, 1998, be struck…

…out on the ground that the respondent has not filed the appeal within the time prescribed by the Rules.…

…************* RULING OF THE COURT By this application brought under rule 80 of the Rules of this Court, the applicant who is acting in person urges that the Notice of Appeal lodged in this court on 9th October, 1998, be struck…

…out on the ground that the respondent has not filed the appeal within the time prescribed by the Rules.…

…an application under rule 4 of the Rules of this Court seeking an extension of time for the filing of the record of appeal from the ruling of the superior court given on 9 March, 1998 whereby the applicant's defence was struck…

…out.…

…The appeal No. 53/93 filed by the applicant was on 27th July, 1999 struck out for failure to comply with Rule 85(1)(c) in that primary documents by way of pleadings were not included in the record.…

…The appeal is ordered to be struck out as incompetent, with costs to the respondent. Order accordingly. Dated at Nakuru this 5th day of October, 1983. C B MADAN ………………. JUDGE OF APPEAL A A KNELLER ………………..…