Search court decisions

…My view over the submissions is that the partiesstretched their arguments beyond the scope of the application.All that the application asks for is a stay under 0. 41 r. 4of Civil Procedure Rules to pend the hearing of the…

…The suggested grounds of appealwere not filed so may be there may be other reasons, secondly, the most important requirement for anapplication under 0.41 r. 4 of Civil Procedure Rules is thatthe applicant will suffer substantial…

…At the same time the plaint was filed the plaintiff filed a Chamber Summons under "Order XXVI rules (sic) 5 Civil Procedure Rules as amended (sic) and Order XXXIX rules 1, 2 & 3 Civil Procedure Rules as amended (sic) and…

…Rules (service of summons on Corporations) to provide for, in the first instance, personal service on relevant officer(s) of the Corporation.…

…On 8th September, 1994 the respondent filed yet another application under Order 21, rule 30 and Order 39 rules (1) (2) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Rules as well as section 27 & 28 of Registered Land Act Cap 300.…

…On 14th February, 1995, once more another application was filed in this matter this time round by the respondent herein under the provisions of Order 46 rule 8 (2) and 19 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking orders inter…

…By a chamber summons under Order 39 rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules the respondent sought an order for injunction against the appellant to restrain it from in any way interfering with the quiet enjoyment and possession…

…respondent's substantive originating summons, the appellant filed its grounds of opposition and took out a motion on notice under sections 3A, 6 and 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order VI rule 13 (1)(a) and (d) of the Civil Procedure…

…This application by way of notice of motion is brought to the Court Under Order XXXV Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure rules.…

…Simultaneously with this plaint, the respondent applied for a temporary injunction under Order 39 rr 1,2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…Meanwhile, on 20th June, 1994 the appellant made an application under Order 39 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking the discharge of the ex parte order made on 19th June, 1994.…

…Order III rule 6 of Civil Procedure Rules clearly stipulates that an advocate on record, until properly removed or changed, is considered the advocate of the party until final conclusion of the cause or matter, including…