Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: SHAH J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: AKIWUMI, PALL, JJ.A. & BOSIRE, AG.J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, LAKHA JJ.A. J.A.) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
its exclusion renders the appeal incurably incompetent. Bigogo does not dispute the fact that the order does not form part of the record of appeal.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
its exclusion renders the appeal incurably incompetent. Bigogo does not dispute the fact that the order does not form part of the record of appeal.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1426 OF 1993 ELIUS GACHII KARANJA .................................
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: (BOSIRE AG. JA (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA ALFARUS MULI .......................................... LAVUTA DODHIA STORES .........................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, OMOLO & PALL, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 33 OF 1996) BETWEEN JOEL KYALO MWEI………...........….….……..APPELLANT AND PAUL NGEI NZIOKA..........…………...…..…RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Machakos (Hon.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, OMOLO & PALL, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 33 OF 1996) BETWEEN JOEL KYALO MWEI………...........….….……..APPELLANT AND PAUL NGEI NZIOKA..........…………...…..…RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Machakos (Hon.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
Upon this, we do not consider that they have an arguable appeal to this Court against the order of the superior which they now seek to have stayed under rule 5 2(b) of the Rules of this Court pending hearing and disposal of their intended appeal. In the result, we think that the two consolidated applications are unmeritorious and the same are dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, LAKHA, JJ.A & BOSIRE Ag. 34 OF 1996 BETWEEN BONIFACE MUSYOKA NDOLO..........................................APPELLANT AND PAULINE KATONGE MUSAU…………….........................SPONDENT (Appeal from the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Machakos (Justice Osiemo) delivered on 29th November, 1995 IN H.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, LAKHA, JJ.A & BOSIRE Ag. 34 OF 1996 BETWEEN BONIFACE MUSYOKA NDOLO..........................................APPELLANT AND PAULINE KATONGE MUSAU…………….........................SPONDENT (Appeal from the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Machakos (Justice Osiemo) delivered on 29th November, 1995 IN H.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal 223 of 1995 CORPORATE INSURANCE CO. LTD................................................................................APPELLANT AND HAMID CHEMICALS LIMITED........................................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice G.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal 223 of 1995 CORPORATE INSURANCE CO. LTD................................................................................APPELLANT AND HAMID CHEMICALS LIMITED........................................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice G.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal 112 of 1995 GERALD MBALE MWEA ……………................................................ …………………………..APPELLANT AND KARIKO KIHARA GICHOMO KIHARA ……………………........................................…………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: SHAH, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS)) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: GICHERU, AKIWUMI & TUNOI, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 314 OF 1996 BETWEEN MARGARET MAKHANJU JOHN .............................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI Coram: Omolo, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
learned single judge of this Court fell into error. In the result, we allow this reference, set aside the order of the single judge of this Court dismissing the applicant's application for extension of time to lodge a Notice of Appeal and to deem its Notice of Appeal lodged in the superior court on 22nd October, 1996 to have been duly lodged within the extended time and substitute therefor an order granting the applicant's said application and extend time for lodging its Notice of Appeal in the