Judgment
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
…It is of course the duty of the prosecution to prove the case against the accused in accordance with Section 45(2) of the Penal Code and beyond reasonable doubt.…
…It is also the duty of the prosecution to prove the criminal intent of the accused person, that is, the intent to overthrow by unlawful means of the Government and the prosecution must also prove the overt acts being the…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Kivihya appearing for the Director of Public Prosecutions opposing the appeal as one without merit submitted that the doctrine of recent possession was properly applied.…
…In the case of Arum v Republic, Court of Appeal at Kisumu Criminal Appeal no. 85 of 2005, it was held that the doctrine of recent possession is applicable where the court is satisfied that the prosecution have proved the…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The prosecution say, all the four appellants took part in the robbery on July 30 at the Bacon Factory and that they all prepared to commit robbery on October 11, 1984.…
…When the appellant was confronted with the charge of robbery, he denied it and put the burden of proof squarely on the prosecution.…
Division and case type: CriminalCase number Criminal Application
…Such sections are the source for the principles of law relating to the burden of proof being always on the prosecution and the standard of proof to be always beyond reasonable doubt.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…suit and the same was never served upon the Plaintiffs until 08.01.2007(five(5) months after filing and almost two(2) months after the Ruling of 27.11.2006 which application is now fixed for hearing on 10.05.2007 3) The prosecution…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…suit and the same was never served upon the Plaintiffs until 08.01.2007(five(5) months after filing and almost two(2) months after the Ruling of 27.11.2006 which application is now fixed for hearing on 10.05.2007 3) The prosecution…