Judgment[1984] KEHC 30
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…I suppose it is fair to say that, if the money was in dollars and the appellant was expected to exchange them on the black-market, it would be unlikely that the prosecution witnesses would say so.…
…There was some substance in the account of the appellant which was to be negatived by the prosecution. On the evidence available, the appellant always said that someone had taken the money.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
…It is of course the duty of the prosecution to prove the case against the accused in accordance with Section 45(2) of the Penal Code and beyond reasonable doubt.…
…It is also the duty of the prosecution to prove the criminal intent of the accused person, that is, the intent to overthrow by unlawful means of the Government and the prosecution must also prove the overt acts being the…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Upon a consideration of the evidence the trial magistrate believed the prosecution witnesses but not the evidence of the appellant or his witness or indeed the statutory statement of Makau Mulei and convicted the appellant…