Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Environment and LandPetition
…Submissions 13. On 18th May, 2023 the Court directed that the application be canvassed by way of written submissions. The Parties complied. Petitioner’s submissions 14.…
…He urged the court to dismiss the Application with costs. 4th respondent’s submissions 20.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…During the oral submissions of the application dated 26/9/2014, the applicant stated that he is the deceased’s son and that his mother was the deceased’s second wife .He states that the respondents should be evicted from…
…Counsel for the 1st respondent stated in the oral submissions that plot 053 and 054 and KANGARI/NDAGARE/763 are the property of the 1st respondent’s husband (now deceased) were was the son to the deceased .These property…
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
…Parties’ submissions 24. The application was canvassed by way of written submissions. The Applicant led his dated 16th December 2025.…
…The Respondents led their submissions dated 26th December 2025. The submissions were a regurgitation of the contents of their Replying Adavit sworn on 14th October 2025.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…At the conclusion of the evidence of the second respondent and the appellant and the Court having visited the land, it was during the course of submission on behalf of the appellant that the learned judge granted leave to…
…When this was realized at the hearing of the case and was made a ground of a submission by the appellant’s advocate, the first respondent, in consequence, and to meet the said objection, applied for leave to add the second…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…Mr Aboo’s further submission was that the respondent’s cause of action was for damages for negligence or breach of duty (the duty existing by virtue of a contract) and the damages he claimed for the negligence and or breach…
…The submissions of Mr Aboo and of Mr Kassim were ably put but in the end those of Mr Aboo do not prevail in the circumstances of this appeal and, in my judgment, the ruling of Mr Justice Bhandari was correct.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Mr Prinja made submissions on 15 grounds of appeal on behalf of Anupchand and 13 for Vijay and Mr Metha replied to them for the Republic, and we are grateful to them for all the work and addition they have brought to bear…
…Here, in this case, after carefully considering all the arguments and submissions on both sides, and our own evaluation of the evidence adduced at the trial, we are left with no reasonable doubt Anupchand and Vijay were properly…