Search court decisions

…He testified in hisevidence in cross examination that he does not know who was driving thedefendants motor vehicle but the owner is the defendant. He further testifiedthat defendants driver was prosecuted by police.…

…Under cross-examination, the respondent explained that the accident involved the subject vehicle and another, but he sued in respect of the subject vehicle as it was the one in which he was traveling.…

…The plaintiff admitted under cross-examination that it was improper to deposit that cheque in an account other than that of the payee named on it. He said: “The cheque was made out to Pump Maintenance EA Ltd.…

…The plaintiff testified in cross-examination that the cheque from Caltex Oil (K) Ltd, was to be cashed through this account and then the proceeds be immediately transferred to account No 4034345.…

…In cross-examination by Mr. Jiwaji for the defendant, this witness said- “There were many people who were going to work. It was about 9.30a.m. I had no watch. There were many people on the road as usual.…

…In the rst place an unsworn statement amounts to no evidence, given that such evidence cannot be tested by way of cross-examination.…

…Dr Khaminwa for the applicant took the view that it would not be necessary to call the doctors for cross-examination. Indeed Dr Khaminwa put this application on a somewhat different footing to the normal.…

…In cross-examination he admitted that change of user was obtained as they were operating the station. See exhibit 13. He confirmed the issue of replacement lease and surrender of the defendant’s lease.…