Search court decisions

…I have considered the grounds of appeal filed by both appellants and the record of the evidence.…

…The complainant did not identify the 1st appellant and the only evidence of the identification of the 1st appellant was that of PW 2 who was an accomplice and also a minor so that his evidence needed corroboration in law…

…The Judge erred because there was no evidence before him that this case is so exceptional as to make it necessary for the provision for future inflation.…

…I would say it is a question of evidence and all the surrounding circumstances whether there has been loss of consortium or not. Each case would be judged on its own facts.…

…There was no evidence before the Court to that eect and there were no evidence to show that the appellant was a party to the signing of Matiba’s nomination papers or even knew anything about them.…

…If there was such evidence it could have been used against the second respondent but certainly could not be used against the appellant. 43.…

…In assessing damages for pain suffering and loss of amenities the learned judge misapprehended the evidence in the crucial aspects of the sequelae of injuries and gave too much weight to Dr..…

…The learned judge recorded evidence from the appellant and his eye specialist Dr Ved, the respondent’s accountant, Andabwa and Aggarwal, another accountant, who has been analyzing date for the local cost of living index.…