“"adjournment"” — court decisions

Judgment[1999] KEHC 68

Judgment[1998] KEHC 11030 September 1998

CONTINENTAL DEVELOPERS LTD v SAUTI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY

High Court at Nairobime on,Mitambo,Gatonye,Ogano,Rachi,Rachi applicant Mr,Rachi Applicant,Kariuki,Mitambo Defendant,Mitambo We,Gatonye says Co,Gatonye They,Gatonye Give,Rachu,Rao,Gatonye last Friday,Gatonye serve Mr,Muruthi,Koyoko,MitiamboCase number Civil Case 933 of 1996

Division and case type: CivilCivil Case

…Rachi appliedfor adjournment as it was 4.20 p.m as he was going to take long to reply toMr. Gatonyes oral application. The application was stood over to the 6. 10.98 but on that day. Mr.…

…The application for adjournment was granted and so Mr. Rachi did not reply to Mr. Gatonye's oral application. Eventually Mr.…

application succeedsAllowed2 min read

Judgment[1998] KEHC 17930 September 1998

CONTINENTAL DEVELOPERS LTD v SAUTI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY

High Court at Nairobiit was fully paid on condition that out of theloan of shs,Gatonye,Mitambo,Ogano,Rachi,Rachi applicant Mr,Rachi Applicant,Kariuki,Kariuki Mr,Mitambo Defendant,Mitambo We,Gatonye says Co,Rachi proceed Mr,Gatonye They,Gatonye Give,Rachu,Rao,Gatonye last Friday,Rachi We,Rao If,Gatonye serve Mr,Rao absent Mr,Muruthi,Koyoko,MitiamboCivil Case 933 of 1996

Division and case type: CivilCivil Case

…Rachi appliedfor adjournment as it was 4.20 p.m as he was going to take long to reply toMr. Gatonyes oral application. The application was stood over to the 6. 10.98 but on that day. Mr.…

…The application for adjournment was granted and so Mr. Rachi did not reply to Mr. Gatonye's oral application. Eventually Mr.…

application succeedsAllowed2 min read

Judgment[2009] KEHC 1129 December 2009

Kimani & 2 others v Attorney General & 2 others

High Court at MombasaOdero,judge before whom Petition,Njoroge,GikandiPetition 669 of 2009

Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition

…Njoroge then made an application for adjournment on two main grounds:- 1.…

…Gikandi argued that any adjournment beyond that would render his clients application nugatory.He said that the application must be heard and a ruling given before 7.01.10 since the CoE must present their report to the 3rdRespondent…

5 min read