Search court decisions

…I suppose it is fair to say that, if the money was in dollars and the appellant was expected to exchange them on the black-market, it would be unlikely that the prosecution witnesses would say so.…

…There was some substance in the account of the appellant which was to be negatived by the prosecution. On the evidence available, the appellant always said that someone had taken the money.…

…The prosecution case before the trial court was that the appellant made a document purporting it to be a sale agreement made and signed by one SALIM AWADH SULEIMAN, agreeing to sell his house at Chaani, Mombasa, to her at…

…The prosecution called evidence to show that a handwritten document which was exhibited may have been forged. A copy of the document was in the possession of the appellant.…

…Upon a consideration of the evidence the trial magistrate believed the prosecution witnesses but not the evidence of the appellant or his witness or indeed the statutory statement of Makau Mulei and convicted the appellant…