Search court decisions

…Summons were never effected on the Ex-parte Applicants. The Ex-parte Applicant is not obliged or under any duty to file a Defence in the absence of Summons. 10.…

…According to them, they do not have originals of any of the said documents as alleged by the Ex-parte Applicants.…

…The Ex-parte Applicants also argue that the statements made to the police do not demonstrate intention to defraud on the part of the Ex-parte Applicants which is a key ingredient in a charge of forgery and uttering false…

…It is his case that the deceased did not sign any will on the day they accompanied him to the offices of the 1st Ex parte applicant and that upon arriving at the offices of the 1st Ex parte applicant on the material day,…

…E804 of 2025 against the Ex Parte Applicants which relate to fraud and breach of contract. 3.…

…Judicial review proceedings are driven by evidence and the record; the Ex-Parte Applicants have provided neither. 30.…

…parte Applicants. 25.…

…parte Applicants. 27.…

….….. 1ST EX PARTE APPLICANT SAMMY NDAMBUKI MULI ……………2ND EX PARTE APPLICANT VS CHIEF MAGISTRATE MILIMANI COMMERCIAL LAW COURTS ……. 1ST RESPONDENT KISERIAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD ………………………………………...2ND RESPONDENT JUDGMENT…

…The ex-parte Applicants have instead instituted the instant proceedings. 52.…

…of the statutory provisions outlined under Section 20 of the Societies Act and purportedly registered by the Ex-Parte Applicants. 77.…

…The Ex-Parte Applicant made all necessary efforts to exhaust available internal remedies without success. 95.…

…The Ex-parte Applicants filed Chamber Summons application dated 19th June, 2023 seeking leave to institute Judicial Review Proceedings for orders of Prohibition. 2.…

…The Ex-parte Applicant did not comply with the ruling prompting the 2ND AND 4TH RESPONDENTS’ to file the NOTICE OF PRELIMINARY OBJECTION Dated 9th day of August 2023. 4.…

…They relied on the grounds inter alia; 1) THAT the Ex-Parte Applicants herein are cognizant that there is a risk of being arrested by the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents.…

…The delay in payments is not a fault of the Ex-Parte Applicants, but rather, an issue of insufficient funds to settle what is due to the various creditors.…

…This Honourable Court granted the Ex-parte Applicants leave to file their substantive Notice of Motion Application on 4th July 2023. 3. The Application was filed on 8th September 2023. 4.…

…The Ex-Parte Applicants filed their Notice of Motion Application on 8th September 2023. 8.…

…Martin Ajujo and Surgeoderm Healthcare, and found that the Applicant herein was not only a director of Surgeoderm Healthcare Ltd but was himself a named ex parte Applicant in the proceedings. 17.…

…He argues that The Taxing Master further observed that the Applicant filed the suit on behalf of all the ex parte Applicants and remained on record until its determination. 18.…

…THE EX-PARTE APPLICANT’ CASE 3.…

…) – Along Meru Road Within Pumwani Hospital Staff Housing Quarters dated 16th November 2022 and marked as Ex-Parte Applicants exhibit “LAO-02”. iii.…

…On 02/01/2020 the ex-parte applicants herein who personally committed to paying her the entire defrauded amount.…

…In fact, the 2nd ex-parte applicant was a part to the said agreement. 38.…

…On 16th February 2024, the Ex-parte applicant was granted leave to file the substantive suit within 14 days and also serve the other parties. 2.…

…As at 24th June 2024 when the matter came up for mention for directions, the Ex-parte Applicants had not complied with the said orders and the ex parte applicant was not in court to explain the reason for non-compliance when…

…The Ex Parte Applicants’ moved this court through the Notice of Motion dated 16th November 2023 seeking the following Orders THAT: (1) an order of PROHIBITION do issue directed at the Respondents prohibiting the Respondents…

…from issuing any orders, notices and directions, or making any decisions adverse to the Ex Parte Applicants’ rights, before due and full compliance with all of the legal requirements relating to decision making in the Kenya…

…The Ex-parte applicants be at liberty to execute against the directors of the interested party named hereinabove. iv. Costs of this application be provided for. 2.…

…It is The Ex-parte Applicants case that they taxed their bill in this suit after which a ruling dated 25th May 2022 was delivered and a decree on record against the Interested Party issued. 4.…

…In the process of reporting compliance, the 1st Ex-parte Applicants’ counsel informed the court that it had filed an application dated for 4th October 2024 seeking the following orders that: a) …spent. b) The court be pleased…

…Section 75(8) provides that an appeal from the decision of the Petition Committee shall be lodged in the High Court. 3) The Ex -Parte Applicants have failed to exhaust the statutory dispute resolution mechanism stipulated…

…The 1st ex- parte Applicant was presented before the 3rd Respondents to answer to the said charges in Milimani Criminal Case Number E758 of 2023 and by that time, the 2nd ex-parte Applicant had not been apprehended. 54.…

…The 2nd Ex-parte Applicant was however not arrested and the claim by the Ex-parte Applicants that the 5th Respondent intend to salvage the criminal proceedings is false. 74.…

…The Ex parte Applicants/Respondents thereafter proceeded to file a Bill of Costs dated 12th April, 2024 necessitating the application before this court. 6.…

…parte Applicants where a decision of the Review Board had been quashed. 16.…

…What the Ex-Parte Applicants disagree with is that such an examination should be a condition precedent to their placement for statutory internship. 26.…

…The Ex-Parte Applicants should further be granted the order of prohibition, as any attempt by the 1st Respondent to administer a procedurally improper examination would be prejudicial to the Ex-Parte Applicants. 41.…

…It is the Interested Party’s (herein after referred to as IP) case that the statements of novelty is a cylindrical neck with cap which the 3rd Ex- parte Applicant has no mention to a cylindrical neck at all. 45.…

…The IP further deponed that the 2nd Respondent seized the products from the Ex- Parte applicants and upon analysis ascertained that the same were counterfeit and abuse to its Intellectual Property Rights. 47.…