Court decisions & case law

Judgment[2015] KECA 14110 December 2015

Abdi Yusuf Maalim v Republic

Court of Appeal at NairobiMuchemi,England,Lynskey,JUDGE APPEAL,NgumbauCase number Criminal Appeal 54 of 2015

Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal

case upheldAllowed8 min read

Judgment[1997] KECA 40225 May 1997

MARY WAMBUI KABUGU v KENYA BUS SERVICE LIMITED

Court of Appeal at NairobiRingera,JUDGE APPEAL,Russell,England,Skingsley,Njuguna,WaiguaCase number Civil Appeal 195 of 1995

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

This is one of the exceptions to the general rule that a party against whom an ex parte order has been made can only apply to the court which made the order to set it aside.”. This court, in its more recent decision in the case of Michael Miana and K.

31 min read

Judgment[1994] KECA 9126 April 1994

Republic v David Makali & 2 others

Court of Appeal at NairobiEngland,JUDGE APPEALCase number Criminal Application 4 of 1994

Division and case type: CriminalCase number Criminal Application

3 min read

Judgment[1994] KECA 11412 January 1994

Nyamodi Ochieng Nyamogo & another v Kenya Posts & Telecommunications Corporation

Court of Appeal at NairobiOwuor,England,judge bench Court,JUDGE APPEALCase number Civil Application 264 of 1993

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

There was no evidence of service of the order 2. Neither the order nor the notice of motion nor any other notice in connection therewith that was served carried an indorsement of penal obligation or consequence.

19 min read

Judgment[1988] KEHC 4915 May 1988

Alphonce Andalo & another t/a Highspeed General Supplies v James Gleen Russel Ltd

High Court at NairobiEnglandCase number Civil Case 590 of 1988

Division and case type: CivilCivil Case

4 min read

Judgment[1987] KECA 6314 May 1987

Otieno v Ougo & another

Court of Appeal at Nairobijudge rejected Wamboi Otieno,England,JUDGE APPEALCivil Appeal 31 of 1987

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

1 min read

Judgment[1986] KECA 4624 November 1986

Maina & 3 others v Republic

Court of Appeal at NairobiEngland,JUDGE APPEALCriminal Appeal E026 of 2021

Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal

unreasonable to hold that the mere possession of the pistol on this date is sufficient to found a conclusion that the appellant participated in the robbery. Neither the trial magistrate nor the High Court pinpointed the evidence they considered cogent enough to justify the conclusion that the 1st appellant participated in the robbery.

13 min read