Search court decisions

….…...RESPONDENT RULING The Notice of Motion application which came for hearing was filed in court on 23rd March 1988. Exparte orders had been granted to the applicant on 7/3/88.…

…at Nairobi, Gachuhi J) RULING This application is in two parts, the first to extend the time for filing the notice of appeal and the second to extend the time for instituting the appeal which, the applicant’s notice of motion…

…We allow the application and order in terms of paragraph 1 and 2 of the notice of motion. The body shall remain in the City Mortuary until further order of this court. No order as to costs.…

…By a further misfortune, before the substantive appeal could come on, Ranchod died on January 14, 1984, and Bhavin, the son of Ranchod and Hiraben has now applied by Notice of Motion to this court under Rules 42 and 96:-…

…It will be observed that the form of the Motion is to appoint (1) Bhavin to represent “the first appellant now deceased”, whom we take to mean Ranchod himself, and (2) Bhavin and Lalita to represent “the second appellant…

…For these reasons we would refuse the leave to appeal sought in the applicant’s notice of motion filed in this Court on 13 September 1990. We would make no order as to the costs of this application.…

…Magolo did not move this court under the said provisions as he did not file an application by way of Notice of motion supported by affidavit but opted to apply for revision.…