Court decisions & case law

Judgment[1998] KEHC 60

Judgment[1998] KEHC 681 November 1998

STEPHEN C. MWANGI v REPUBLIC

High Court at MombasaBwonwongaCase number Criminal Appeal 68 of 1998

Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Criminal Appeal 66 of 1998 STEPHEN C. MWANGI..........................................................................

11 min read

Judgment[1996] KECA 20225 January 1996

Bamburi Portland Cement Company Limited v Imranali Chandbhai Abdulhussein

Court of Appeal at MombasaJudge Kencem,Judge awarded him Shs,JUDGE APPEAL,Khaminwa,Khanna,OngeriCase number Civil Appeal 83 of 1995

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: GACHUHI, OMOLO & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 83 OF 1995 BETWEEN BAMBURI PORTLAND CEMENT CO.

2 min read

Judgment[1995] KECA 6325 July 1995

Bamburi Portland Cement Company Limited v Imranali Chandbhai Abdulhussein

Court of Appeal at MombasaJUDGE APPEAL,Khaminwa,KhannaCase number Civil Appeal 83 of 1995

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: GACHUHI, OMOLO & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 83 OF 1995 BETWEEN BAMBURI PORTLAND CEMENT CO.

2 min read

Judgment[1994] KEHC 2322 March 1994

DIAMOND TRUST OF (K) LTD v CAR & GENERAL (K) LTD

High Court at Mombasahire installments in respect of the vehicle had been fully,paid Four Seasons became,Khanna Diamond Trust,KhannaCase number Civil Case 17 of 1993

Division and case type: CivilCivil Case

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI HIGH COURT CIVIL CASE NO. 17 OF 1993 MURITHI KAGUNDU ……………………………………….

4 min read

Judgment[1984] KEHC 548 December 1984

JOSEPH KARISA MUTSONGA v JOHNSON NYATI

High Court at MombasaSheridan,Judge Mombasa,Joseph,Macharia Muhuni Mr,Macharia Muhuni,Kupalia,Jayantilal Shah,CuthbertCase number Civil Suit 295 of 1976

Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit

and Mr Jayantilal Shah of that firm took over his defence. He applied on October 11, 1982 for an order that his firm should cease to act for the defendant because it could get no further instructions in the suit from the defendant which the defendant said he had not alternative but to accept and it was all right if the firm did not wish to represent him.

26 min read