Court decisions & case law

Judgment[2024] KEHC 1614419 December 2024

Judgment[2002] KECA 29312 December 2002

Andrew Ndambuki Muthike v Republic

Court of Appeal at NyeriJUDGE APPEAL,Kigotho,MahanCase number Criminal Appeal 108 of 2000

Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (CORAM: SHAH, BOSIRE & OWUOR JJ A ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 108 OF 2000 BETWEEN ANDREW NDAMBUKI MUTHIKE..................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC .................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court at Nyeri, Juma & Mulwa JJ dated June 6, 2000 in High Court Criminal Appeal No 250 of 1998) ***************************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT This is a second appeal from the decision of the High Court of Kenya at Nyeri.

6 min read

Judgment[1996] KECA 14711 June 1996

Shaheen Yakub (Nee Khalfan) v Ijaz Yakub

Court of Appeal at NairobiJUDGE APPEAL,MahanCase number Civil Appeal 51 of 1996

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, KWACH & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 51 OF 1996 BETWEEN SHAHEEN YAKUB (NEE KHALFAN) ................APPELLANT AND IJAZ YAKUB ..................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Justice S.O.

1 min read

Judgment[1988] KECA 8420 March 1988

Karuru Munyororo v Joseph Ndumia Murage

Court of Appeal at Nyerijudge Land Board,JUDGE APPEAL,MahanCase number Civil Appeal 149 of 1986

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (Coram:Nyarangi, Platt & Gachuhi JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 149 OF 1986 BETWEEN KARURU MUNYORORO....................................APPELLANT AND JOSEPH NDUMIA MURAGE............................RESPONDENT

appeal is allowedAllowed8 min read

Judgment[1984] KEHC 548 December 1984

JOSEPH KARISA MUTSONGA v JOHNSON NYATI

High Court at MombasaSheridan,Judge Mombasa,Joseph,Macharia Muhuni Mr,Macharia Muhuni,Kupalia,Jayantilal Shah,CuthbertCase number Civil Suit 295 of 1976

Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit

and Mr Jayantilal Shah of that firm took over his defence. He applied on October 11, 1982 for an order that his firm should cease to act for the defendant because it could get no further instructions in the suit from the defendant which the defendant said he had not alternative but to accept and it was all right if the firm did not wish to represent him.

26 min read