Judgment[1994] KECA 93
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI ( Coram: Gachuhi,Cockar & Omolo JJ A ) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 55 OF 1986 BETWEEN NGORORO...............................................................................APPELLANT AND NDUTHA & ANOTHER.....................................................RESPONDENTS (Appeal from the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi of the Chief Justice the Honourable Mr Justice Simpson delivered on 9th August, 1985) in HCCC No 3350 of 1984) *********************************
Division and case type: CriminalCase number Criminal Application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Cockar, Muli & Omolo JJ A) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO NAI 5 OF 1993 MARK OWEGGI …………………..APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………..……RESPONDENT (Appeal from a ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Mr Justice Oguk) dated 28th September, 1993 in Misc Criminal Appl No 419 of 1993) RULING We are of the clear view that there is no merit in the application before us and it must accordingly fail. The applicant Mr Mark Oweggi is an advocate of the High Court of
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionMiscellaneous Criminal Application
tends as a direction to the Court hearing the application for Order of Prohibition to grant the Order without using its own discretion whether it should do so. The Attorney-General did not need any authority, nor a reminder, that in the light of the opinions expressed by the Constitutional Court he could terminate the proceedings even when coupled with a wet hope that he would do so.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Parliament at the next or any subsequent session. They therefore became invalid and detention orders made became null and void ab initio.