Judgment[1999] KECA 110
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Application
is Order VI rule 13(1) and an order under that provision is also equally appealable as of right under Order XLII rule 1. I am, therefore, satisfied that an appeal does lie in the instant case without leave from the decision of the Judge which is sought to be appealed against.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, AKIWUMI & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 125 OF 1990 BETWEEN BONIFACE NJOROGE..................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice Tank) dated 10th May, 1989 in H.C.CR.A.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: KWACH, OMOLO & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 157 OF 1992 BETWEEN ZAKAYO N.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: KWACH, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
pursuant to the appellate powers of that court. The section does not expressly state that all such orders shall be appealable to this Court.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Gicheru, Muli & Tunoi JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 33 OF 1993 GATEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ….....….….APPELLANT VERSUS PAUL KAMAU WAITHAKA …….……………….………RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Ruling and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi of the Honourable Mr Justice Tank dated 29th April, 1992 in High Court Civil Case No 670 of 1992)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 3432 OF 1988 JOSEPH MUTHUSI & 2 OTHERS…………………… APPLICANTS VERSUS WILLIAM GATHOGO & 2 OTHERS …………......... RESPONDENTS RULING This is an application by way of Chamber Summons for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants/respondents from conducting elections until the determination of this suit.
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionMiscellaneous Criminal Application
tends as a direction to the Court hearing the application for Order of Prohibition to grant the Order without using its own discretion whether it should do so. The Attorney-General did not need any authority, nor a reminder, that in the light of the opinions expressed by the Constitutional Court he could terminate the proceedings even when coupled with a wet hope that he would do so.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Parliament at the next or any subsequent session. They therefore became invalid and detention orders made became null and void ab initio.