Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…In the affidavit in support of the application in case NAI 33 of 1983 (relating to the other applicant) Mr Wamae stated that it was this applicant’s failure to pass on the result of the case (of which Mr Wamae had informed…
…As Mr Gathuru says, the nature of the confusion which existed in the mind of the clerk was not specified in the affidavit of Mr Wamae, neither did the clerk himself swear an affidavit.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…In his ruling the learned judge was clearly conscious of the fact that the application then before him could not be decided on a consideration of the opposing affidavits, but that, having regard to those affidavits, it was…
…Mr Lakha began by referring to Mr Panesar’s affidavit of September 23 in which he specifically refuted the suggestion that Dynamics Engineering Ltd was ever intended to be run as a partnership.…
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionMiscellaneous Criminal Application
…Mr Chunga in particular referred to paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of the affidavit as being totally hearsay, the Court does not act upon hearsay evidence he said.…
…A great deal of time was spent on arguing that the respondent had not filed an affidavit in reply.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…These grounds are set out in an affidavit which was sworn by themselves.…
…The respondent having filed an affidavit to the effect that in the case of each detainee notification of his detention had been duly published in the Gazette within 14 days as required by section 83(2)(b) of the Constitution…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The second of these grants is annexed to Bhavin’s supporting affidavit and is in his favour, as follows:- “To commence carry on or defend all actions and other proceedings touching the properties or any part thereof and affairs…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…Magolo did not move this court under the said provisions as he did not file an application by way of Notice of motion supported by affidavit but opted to apply for revision.…