Search court decisions

…PW1 in his evidence admitted he had given the items to Appellant to use but said they were not to be removed from his compound.…

…The evidence of PW1 is to the effect that he had allowed appellant the use of the items. These items are such that with time they suffer from wear and tear.…

…This submission is consistent with the appellant’s evidence in lower court when he said that he had owned the disputed plot for a long time and that the crops on it at that time were also his property.…