Judgment[1993] KEHC 13
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Civil Case 842 of 1988 JOHN KAMUNYU MURIGI…………..…..….....………………..PLAINTIFF - versus - PIRI MWATATA TEITEI…………...…..………...……….1ST DEFENDANT LAND REGISTRAR – KILIFI…………………....……...2ND DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
That evidence so far as it was adduced by the respondent fell foul of the requirements of rule 5 of Order 75: it failed to establish that the appellant was “the relevant “person”. The upshot of that is that the High Court did not have admiralty jurisdiction and the respondent was not entitled to invoke that jurisdiction.