Court decisions & case law

Judgment[1999] KECA 17031 October 1999

Judgment[1999] KECA 11030 May 1999

MACCU MOTORS LIMITED v 1. BIKABHAI MATHURBHAI PATEL 2. FRANK KAMUNDI MWONGERA 3. CYPRIAN IBURI NGARURO 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF LANDS

Court of Appeal at NairobiEtyang,JUDGE APPEAL,BandulaCase number Criminal Miscellaneous Application 289 of 1997

Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Application

is Order VI rule 13(1) and an order under that provision is also equally appealable as of right under Order XLII rule 1. I am, therefore, satisfied that an appeal does lie in the instant case without leave from the decision of the Judge which is sought to be appealed against.

4 min read

Judgment[1994] KECA 6620 February 1994

Joseph Njoroge Njuguna v Republic

Court of Appeal at NakuruAganyanya,JUDGE APPEALCRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 39 OF 1992

Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU CORAM: COCKAR, OMOLO & TUNOI, JJ.A. 39 OF 1992 BETWEEN JOSEPH NJOROGE NJUGUNA .............................

appeal failsDismissed2 min read

Judgment[1992] KECA 2024 September 1992

Agnes Wairimu Gichuki v Republic

Court of Appeal at NakuruAganyanya,JUDGE APPEALCase number Criminal Appeal 37 of 1992

Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal

REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU Criminal Appeal 37 of 1992 JOSEPH KIPTURGOT A TOWET……………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………….………………………………….

1 min read

Judgment[1991] KEHC 1917 March 1991

Kimani v Republic

High Court at MombasaattackCriminal Appeal 266 of 1990

Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal

REPUBLIC OF KENYA Kimani v Republic High Court, at Mombasa March 18, 1991 Wambilyangah J Criminal Appeal Case No 266 of 1990 (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No 269 of 1990 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Voi, JM Manyasi (Miss) RM) Evidence – identification evidence – accused momentarily encountering his attacker who later blindfolds him – whether circumstances conducive for proper identification - whether known foot marks can be used to support allegation of the pre

Appeal allowedAllowed4 min read