Court decisions & case law

Judgment[2019] KEHC 48618 December 2019

Judgment[2000] KEHC 49521 August 2000

ERIC PETER WANJAU v GEORGE MUNDET

High Court at NairobiJUDGE APPEAL,Igeria,Gachomba,ItCase number Civil Suit 3257 of 1978

Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO. 3257 OF 1978 ERIC PETER WANJAU .................................................PLAINTIFF AND GEORGE MUNDET ....................................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G On 26th of March, 1993 this court entered a judgment pursuant to an Award filed and read in court on 2nd December, 1992, in the presence of Mr.

8 min read

Judgment[1995] KEHC 1214 May 1995

HELLEN MUHONJA MAINA v PETER KINAGI GITUKA

High Court at NairobiGachomba,Thomas Bernado Children,KyaloCase number Civil Case 3723 of 1990

Division and case type: CivilCivil Case

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 3723 of 1990 HELLEN MUHONJA MAINA................................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS PETER KINAGI GITUKA..................................................

17 min read

Judgment[1993] KEHC 16529 November 1993

Githunguri & another t/a Githunguri & Collins Architects v Kenya Railways Corporation

High Court at Nairobime they have raised the issue of the jurisdiction to entertain both the suit,application,relying on the arbitration clause,HoweverCase number Civil Suit 2461 of 1992

Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 2461 OF 1992 GITHUNGURI & ANOTHER T/A GITHUNGURI & COLLINS ARCHITECTS …….……..APPLICANT VERSUS KENYA RAILWAYS CORPORATION….…………… DEFENDANT

5 min read

Judgment[1989] KECA 4816 November 1989

Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillian S" v Caltex Oil

Court of Appeal at MombasaAct,Bosire,JUDGE APPEAL,Inamdar,Alexander,Satchu,Kariuki,Saliarelis,Tsakiris,PLSCivil Appeal 50 of 1989

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

That evidence so far as it was adduced by the respondent fell foul of the requirements of rule 5 of Order 75: it failed to establish that the appellant was “the relevant “person”. The upshot of that is that the High Court did not have admiralty jurisdiction and the respondent was not entitled to invoke that jurisdiction.

Appeal allowedAllowed77 min read

Judgment[1988] KECA 5810 May 1988

Okong'o v Attorney-General & another

Court of Appeal at Kisumujudge High Court,Act,JUDGE APPEAL,WasunaCase number Civil Appeal 170 of 1986

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Platt, Apaloo JJA & Masime Ag JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 170 OF 1986 BETWEEN OKONG’O...........................................................................APPELLANT AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL & ANOTHER..............................RESPONDENT

Appeal refusedDismissed8 min read