Judgment[1991] KEHC 10
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
have the ex-parte judgment set aside and in consequence all subsequent orders including the order appealed against are nullified. The appeal must be allowed.” It follows therefore, that the exparte judgment of 29th of April, 1991 was entered against the 2nd defendant/respondent, Mwika in error.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU Civil Case 215 of 1990 M’IKUNYUA IBARI STEPHEN KIJOGI IBARI………………………….PLAINTIFFS versus NKANATA M’IBARI……………...…....……..……DEFENDANT 28/1/91 Coram: SO Oguk – judge Plaintiff in person Defendant - absent Court Interpreter – Murungi
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL CASE NO 26 OF 1990 MURUNGI NKAMBI …. … PLAINTIFF versus DAVID M’ABURI … ….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Ndegwa v Republic Court of Appeal, at Nakuru September 23, 1985 Madan, Kneller & Nyarangi JJA Criminal Appeal No 125 of 1984 (Appeal from the High Court at Nakuru, Masime J) September 23, 1985, Madan, Kneller & Nyarangi JJA delivered the following Judgment, The appellant was convicted of stealing from the person Kshs 2,200 and a Seiko wrist watch, the property of Joseph Maina, contrary to section 279(a) of the Penal Code (cap 63). His appeal to the High Court (Masime J) having been summarily re