Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…As regards the evidence in support of the prosecution case the court below relied on the identification of the appellant by both PW 1 and PW 2.…
…The learned trial magistrate considered all the evidence before him and including the appellant’s defence and was satisfied on the basis of that evidence that it was the appellant who snatched the complainant’s property.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…As regards the evidence in support of the prosecution case the court below relied on the identification of the appellant by both PW 1 and PW 2.…
…The learned trial magistrate considered all the evidence before him and including the appellant’s defence and was satisfied on the basis of that evidence that it was the appellant who snatched the complainant’s property.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The defendant did not offer any evidence. The only direct evidence on how the accident happened was given by James Odero Jowi who told the Judge – “I knew Joseph Nzioka Mwana. He was a driver of a fork lift.…
…She accepted this evidence and held the defendant liable. In the assessment of damages the learned Judge rejected the evidence of income of the deceased and the plaintiff’s claim that she had 5 children.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…(c) Costs of this suit together with interest thereon at court rates;” However, the evidence led on behalf of the respondent at the ensuing trial, was to explain the somewhat confused claim contained in the amended plaint…
…The evidence given by the appellant at the trial followed these lines. We think that at this stage, we can again express our view on another important issue.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…We will call oral evidence to support the defence and counter-claim.”…
…Be that as it may, there is no evidence on record that any resolution was passed even going by the account given by the appellants.…