Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
…The application is further supported by the applicant’s affidavit dated 9th August, 2011. The applicant in her affidavit has deponed that the deceased left behind several properties one of them being L. R.…
…The respondent filed a Replying Affidavit on 26th August, 2011 in response to the applicant’s application.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…There was only one accompanying affidavit in support and that was by Nyamogo, the 1st applicant. The detailed acts of refusal are deponed to therein.…
…However, in his replying affidavit sworn on 16th November, 1993, and filed on the same day Mr Malakwen states and we quote: “I have now seen the notice of motion dated 28th October, 1993, and an affidavit sworn by one Mr…
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
…Riungu relied on the supporting affidavit of the applicant. He referred to the contents of the affidavit where the applicant claims that she only learnt about the suit in question 6 months after her husband's death.…
…Akwalu for the Defendant/Respondent opposed the application and relied on the replying affidavit of the Defendant/Respondent sworn on 30th November, 2012.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…XXXVI rule 3D of the Civil Procedure Rules – the Rules provides that: “3D (1) An application under section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act shall be made by Originating Summons. (2) The summons shall be supported by an affidavit…
…Summons dated 28th October, 1991 which was subsequently amended on 13th February, 1992 and filed in the superior court on the following day and re-amended on 24th March, 1993 annexed to which was the requisite supporting affidavit…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…He also relied on the affidavit of Joseph Muthusi and the documents annexed thereto.…
…The only disadvantage I can see on the part of the plaintiffs is that “Any action taken by Mr Mulei is always intended for his own benefit or of his henchmen” as deponed to by the first named plaintiff in the responding affidavit…