Judgment[1989] KECA 48
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
That evidence so far as it was adduced by the respondent fell foul of the requirements of rule 5 of Order 75: it failed to establish that the appellant was “the relevant “person”. The upshot of that is that the High Court did not have admiralty jurisdiction and the respondent was not entitled to invoke that jurisdiction.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: PLATT, GACHUHI & APALOO JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 217 OF 1986 BETWEEN HAMISI BAKARI ……..................….……1ST APPELLANT RUKIA DZERI ……......................….……2ND APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC……………………....…………RESPONDENT JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The appellants, Hamisi Bakari and Rukia Dzeri were charged with burglary and theft contrary to sections 304(2) and 279(b) of the Penal Code.