Court decisions & case law

Judgment[2019] KEHC 48618 December 2019

PMK v Inspector General of Police, Director of Criminal Investigations & Attorney General

High Court at Machakos

Judgment[1999] KECA 16516 December 1999

MOSES KIPNGETICH KURGAT v THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE LAW SOCIETY

Court of Appeal at Vs The DisciplinaryJUDGE APPEAL,Moses Kipngetich Kurgat,Gordon Sichale,Abuodha,GaturuCase number Civil Miscellaneous Application 163 of 1999

Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OWUOR, J.A (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 62/99) BETWEEN MOSES KIPNGETICH KURGAT ..............................APPLICANT AND THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE LAW SOCIETY ...................................RESPONDENT (Application for stay of execution in an intended appeal from the ruling and order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon.

application is dismissedDismissed2 min read

Judgment[1999] KECA 1216 December 1999

JOEL MUTHUI KYAMBU v UNITED FINANCE LIMITED

Court of Appeal at NairobiJUDGE APPEAL,Gaturu

Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, KWACH & TUNOI, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 260 OF 1999 BETWEEN JOEL MUTHUI KYAMBU .................................

appeal grantedAllowed2 min read

Judgment[1999] KECA 306 December 1999

JOEL MUTHUI KYAMBU v UNITED FINANCE LIMITED

Court of Appeal at NairobiJUDGE APPEAL,GaturuCase number Civil Miscellaneous Application 260 of 1999

Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, KWACH & TUNOI, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 260 OF 1999 BETWEEN JOEL MUTHUI KYAMBU .................................

appeal grantedAllowed2 min read

Judgment[1989] KECA 4816 November 1989

Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillian S" v Caltex Oil

Court of Appeal at MombasaAct,Bosire,JUDGE APPEAL,Inamdar,Alexander,Satchu,Kariuki,Saliarelis,Tsakiris,PLSCivil Appeal 50 of 1989

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

That evidence so far as it was adduced by the respondent fell foul of the requirements of rule 5 of Order 75: it failed to establish that the appellant was “the relevant “person”. The upshot of that is that the High Court did not have admiralty jurisdiction and the respondent was not entitled to invoke that jurisdiction.

Appeal allowedAllowed77 min read

Judgment[1988] KECA 5810 May 1988

Okong'o v Attorney-General & another

Court of Appeal at Kisumujudge High Court,Act,JUDGE APPEAL,WasunaCase number Civil Appeal 170 of 1986

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Platt, Apaloo JJA & Masime Ag JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 170 OF 1986 BETWEEN OKONG’O...........................................................................APPELLANT AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL & ANOTHER..............................RESPONDENT

Appeal refusedDismissed8 min read