Judgment[2019] KEHC 486
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsConstitutional Petition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO. 25 OF 2015 ABDULKARIM SALEH MUHSIN......................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS 1.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
(d) It is just in the circumstances of this case and in the interests of justice that the restraining orders be granted. Opposing the application, the 1st Defendant filed grounds of opposition on 9th July, 2010 which were supplemented by the 1st Defendant’s replying affidavit sworn by Jon Waïn, the 1st Defendant’s Legal Counsel on 15th July, 2010.
Division and case type: CriminalCase number Criminal Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CORAM: SHAH, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: KWACH, SHAH & OWUOR JJ.A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118/98) BETWEEN NYANJA HOLDINGS LIMITED GEORGE NJAU MBUGUA NYANJA MRS.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
what I need to consider in this taxation bearing in mind the Authorities cited, I have come to a conclusion that Ksh.120,000/= would be reasonable fee for instructions in this appeal which I allow. Ksh.180,000/= is taxed off from this item.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: LAKHA, PALL, JJ.A. & BOSIRE, AG.J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: OMOLO, TUNOI & PALL, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 1996 BETWEEN WALTER MAGANA OKORE ....................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI ( Coram: Gachuhi, Kwach & Akiwumi JJ A ) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 87 OF 1993 BETWEEN KENINDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED........................................APPELLANT AND PATRIC MUTURI.....................................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Meru (Mr Justice Kuloba) dated 11th day of May, 1993 in HCCC No 114 of 1990) *********************************
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
That evidence so far as it was adduced by the respondent fell foul of the requirements of rule 5 of Order 75: it failed to establish that the appellant was “the relevant “person”. The upshot of that is that the High Court did not have admiralty jurisdiction and the respondent was not entitled to invoke that jurisdiction.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Platt, Apaloo JJA & Masime Ag JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 170 OF 1986 BETWEEN OKONG’O...........................................................................APPELLANT AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL & ANOTHER..............................RESPONDENT