JudgmentPETER EROYAN MUDA VS SEED OF HOME OPHANAGE
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtClaim/Causes
…It is trite law that whoever alleges must prove and the Claimant in this case had the onus to prove his case on a balance of probability and in particular, that he was actually an employee of the Respondent which he failed…
…In view of the foregoing, I find that the Claimant has failed to prove his case on a balance of probability to the effect that he was employed by the Respondent between 1st March 2013 and 28th February 2018. 13.…
Division and case type: High Court Commercial and TaxCommercial Matters
…The main issue for determination is whether the Plaintiff has proved, on the balance of probabilities, that the Defendants jointly and/or severally caused the subject account to be opened without the knowledge, instructions…
…Lord Denning, in Miller v Minister of Pensions [1947] ALL ER 372, aptly summarised the application of the standard of proof in civil cases; proof on the balance of probabilities as follows: That degree is well settled.…
Division and case type: Environment and LandMiscellaneous Application
…It is our humble view that the Claimant, on a balance of probability, has proved negligence on the part of the Respondent.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…It is our humble view that the Claimant, on a balance of probability, has proved negligence on the part of the Respondent.…