Judgment[2017] KEHC 100
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The card was put in evidence as exhibit Pex 6. The antenatal clinic card of the mother of PW 2 was also put in evidence as exhibit Pexb.7. Pexb.7 shows that PW 2 was in good health. 9.…
…In this regard, there is the evidence of PW 2 that the appellant had sexual intercourse with her. Then there is the medical evidence of Hillary Kiptoo (PW 1), who examined PW 2.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsElection Petition
…(xxxiii) THAT the Respondent herein relied on hearsay evidence which he was unable to substantiate during the hearing of the Petition and should now not be allowed to re-open his case by fishing for fresh evidence which was…
…and lay a basis in the Petition and the Affidavit evidence filed in support of the Petition.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsElection Petition
…(xxxiii) THAT the Respondent herein relied on hearsay evidence which he was unable to substantiate during the hearing of the Petition and should now not be allowed to re-open his case by fishing for fresh evidence which was…
…and lay a basis in the Petition and the Affidavit evidence filed in support of the Petition.…
Division and case type: COMMERCIAL DIVISIONJudicial Review
…Firstly, that the issues being raised by the appellant were neither new nor compelling evidence as the issues had been raised and addressed by the Court of Appeal during the hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 363 of 2006.…
…In support of these submissions the respondent cited Maharaj v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (supra), and urged the Court to dismiss the appeal. [25] The evidence that was before the High Court in support of the…
Division and case type: CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISIONCivil Appeal
…Firstly, that the issues being raised by the appellant were neither new nor compelling evidence as the issues had been raised and addressed by the Court of Appeal during the hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 363 of 2006.…
…In support of these submissions the respondent cited Maharaj v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (supra), and urged the Court to dismiss the appeal. [25] The evidence that was before the High Court in support of the…