Judgment[2008] KEHC 253
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…Counsel noted that the respondent did not adduce any evidence relating to the policy. Counsel maintained that the appellant called evidence to confirm its position that the policy did not cover passengers. 8.…
…I have carefully reconsidered and evaluated the evidence which was adduced before the trial magistrate. The evidence was clear that the respondent was injured in an accident whilst traveling in the subject vehicle.…
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
…In an application for review under Order 44, rule 1, which this one is, the applicant must demonstrate the discovery of a new and important matter or evidence which, after exercise of due diligence, was not within his knowledge…
…No discovery of such new and important matter or evidence is pleaded in the grounds on the face of the application or in the supporting affidavit.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…In an application for review under Order 44, rule 1, which this one is, the applicant must demonstrate the discovery of a new and important matter or evidence which, after exercise of due diligence, was not within his knowledge…
…No discovery of such new and important matter or evidence is pleaded in the grounds on the face of the application or in the supporting affidavit.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
…Without proper evidence before me, I can only use the words of the Court of Appeal in Daniel Nyanza & Others vs Republic Cr.…
…Appeal No. 134/2005 and state as follows: “Under all those circumstances, there is no proper evidence on the complaint based on violation of the appellants’ rights under section 72(3) (b) of the Constitution.…