Judgment[2006] KEHC 583
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The first one is that the learned Principal magistrate erred in proceeding to hear the two applications in the face of the stay order in HC Misc. Civil Application Number 261 of 2006.…
…The second issue that the Appellant was not given sufficient notice for the hearing of the applications has equally no merit. The applications had been served much earlier.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…Application No 646 of 2004, without notifying or inviting the Board to the hearing of the Application as an interested party.…
…of the Application, the same is fatally defective. iii) To the extent that the Application is grounded on a court order issued in Misc.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…The application is supported by affidavits sworn by ATUL SHAH dated 8th May, 2007 and ROBERT FOULSER dated 24th January, 2007. The application was strongly contested.…
…The substantive application, was heard by Kasango, J who dismissed the application discharged the 1st Defendant and released the security which had been given.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Suit
…defendants who have not brought an application.…
…The court will begin by considering whether or not the application is defeated by the pleadings not being close.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…The application is brought by the plaintiff against the defendant.…
…Hence this suit and application.…