Judgment[2004] KEHC 718
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: COMMERCIAL DIVISIONCivil Suit
…Plaintiff’s counsel in submission stated that the 3rd defendants application was incompetent for failing to have a supporting affidavit.…
…Order 50 Rule 7 requires an applicant by summons to state in general terms the grounds of the application and where the summons is based on evidence by affidavit a copy of that affidavit is to be served.…
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
…In his affidavit in support of the application, the applicant has deponed that both the respondents are his estranged wives. That the ten (10) children are not his.…
…Momanyi for the respondents relied on the replying affidavit and added that the application is fatally defective for having been brought under the wrong section of the law.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…In his affidavit in support of the application, the applicant has deponed that both the respondents are his estranged wives. That the ten (10) children are not his.…
…Momanyi for the respondents relied on the replying affidavit and added that the application is fatally defective for having been brought under the wrong section of the law.…
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relationsmiscellaneous cause
…Next the court, though alive to the principle that one who depones to an affidavit must be one who can be cross-examined on the depositions, and counsel like Ms Kasmani does not fall in such a category here, yet considering…
…the circumstances of the 2nd respondent (he is held in remand) and that Ms Kasmani properly stated as to the source of her information (the 2nd respondent), the affidavit in support of this application need not be faulted…