Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…(IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO. 163 OF 2001 BETWEEN EDWIN OTIENO OCHOLLA PAA PRODUCTS LIMITED FISHERMANS PRODUCTS LIMITED .......................…
…There is also quite inordinate delay from August 8, 2001 when the record of appeal was purportedly served and the time this application was brought to Court on October 31, 2001.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…DEFENDANT RULING This is an application for judgment to be entered against the defendant on the ground that the defendant has admitted the claim and that the defence filed by it herein is a mere denial which raises no triable…
…The application is supported by an affidavit sworn on 7.9.2001 by Hasmukh Kanji Patel a director of the plaintiff company which shows that the claim by the plaintiff against the defendant arises from goods said to have been…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
….…….. 3RD DEFENDANT RULING The three defendants herein have brought this application for an order that the suit filed against them by the defendant be dismissed for want of prosecution.…
…The application is supported by an affidavit sworn on 11.7.2001 by Dipak Panachand Shah the 2nd defendant, which sets out the facts on which the applicants rely.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
….…….. 3RD DEFENDANT RULING The three defendants herein have brought this application for an order that the suit filed against them by the defendant be dismissed for want of prosecution.…
…The application is supported by an affidavit sworn on 11.7.2001 by Dipak Panachand Shah the 2nd defendant, which sets out the facts on which the applicants rely.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…Efforts to get the respondent either produce the receipt for paying the court fees has been fruitless hence this application.…
…The respondent opposed the application on the grounds that it is for the court to show that fees was not paid.…