Search court decisions

…An appeal from that decision being Civil Appeal No. 287 of 1996 was, on 30 October, 1997 struck out for being incompetent as the certified copy of the order appealed from did not comply with the provisions of Order XX rule…

…The only specific provision under which a suit may be struck out is Order VI rule 13(1) and an order under that provision is also equally appealable as of right under Order XLII rule 1.…

…Mrs Dias' complaint is that the four Judges struck out two appeals on technicalities.…

…The two appeals which were struck out were incompetent. Their records omitted primary documents which were necessary for the proper determination of the appeal.…

…out on 20 May, 1999.…

…The Certificate of Delay included in the original appeal which was struck out and the one attached to the present application states in paragraph 6 as follows: "By letter dated 20th May 1998 the Advocates were notified that…

…1996) CONSOLIDATED WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 90 OF 1996) ***************** ORDER OF THE COURT As the record of appeal does not contain certified copies of the decrees appealed against, this appeal is incompetent and is hereby struck…

…out with no order as to costs.…

…That being so, the notice of appeal and the appeal abovementioned are struck out with costs of the appeal and this application. Made at Nairobi this 29th day of July, 1999. J.E. GICHERU ..................…

…************* RULING OF THE COURT By this application brought under rule 80 of the Rules of this Court, the applicant who is acting in person urges that the Notice of Appeal lodged in this court on 9th October, 1998, be struck…

…out on the ground that the respondent has not filed the appeal within the time prescribed by the Rules.…

…************* RULING OF THE COURT By this application brought under rule 80 of the Rules of this Court, the applicant who is acting in person urges that the Notice of Appeal lodged in this court on 9th October, 1998, be struck…

…out on the ground that the respondent has not filed the appeal within the time prescribed by the Rules.…

…an application under rule 4 of the Rules of this Court seeking an extension of time for the filing of the record of appeal from the ruling of the superior court given on 9 March, 1998 whereby the applicant's defence was struck…

…out.…

…The appeal No. 53/93 filed by the applicant was on 27th July, 1999 struck out for failure to comply with Rule 85(1)(c) in that primary documents by way of pleadings were not included in the record.…

…The applicant filed a sham defence which was struck out and judgment entered in favour of the respondent.…

…On 19th September, 1997, his notice of appeal was struck out by this Court for the reason of his non-compliance with the order of the single judge of this Court dated 18th October, 1993 extending time by 30 days within which…

…On 19th September, 1997, his notice of appeal was struck out by this Court for the reason of his non-compliance with the order of the single judge of this Court dated 18th October, 1993 extending time by 30 days within which…

…The applicant filed a sham defence which was struck out and judgment entered in favour of the respondent.…

…It is contended by the petitioner that the application be struck out as a sham and abuses the court process. As the goods were supplied in 1996 to 1997, the company does not show liability has ever been disputed.…

…The superior court (Commissioner Gacheche) struck out the plaint and entered summary judgment against the applicant in the sum of Shs. 11,800,000/-.…

…Trigeli Ltd (trading as Southern Window and General Clearing Co and Another 3 AER 671 where the District Registrar made a consent order that the defence of both defendants should be struck out unless the interrogations were…