Judgment[1995] KECA 165
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…In the cross examination of the respondent, it was suggested to her that she owned plot No 133R Ongata Rongai and not plot No 133B Ongata Rongai.…
…In the course of cross examination of the second appellant, she said that she did not know where plot No 133 B and or 133 R was nor who occupied them, thus conceding that plot No 133 B could belong to the respondent and could…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…been shot at by some unknown persons and that they had later come upon a group of people among whom were James, Vincent, Nicholas and Peter who were preparing to burn houses of Tesos because as he said rather lamely, in cross…
…examination, "they were many in a house".…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The point was stressed that while witnesses as to the local custom could have their evidence tested by cross-examination and the defence would also have the opportunity of calling evidence to controvert their opinion the…
…opinions given by assessors would, in the normal course, be given at the end of the case when the parties would have no opportunity to test their opinions by cross-examination, or be able to call evidence to contradict these…