Judgment[1994] KECA 99
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI ( Coram: Gachuhi, Cockar & Muli JJ A ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 1993 BETWEEN DANIEL WACHIRA MUNENE.........................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.....................................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Mr Justice JA Mango) dated 23rd December 1992, in Criminal Case No 7 of 1992) ***********************************
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
as if their action had been begun by filing a plaint. According to him, the provisions of rule 10 of order XXXVI of the Rules had been brought to the attention of the judge and since a claim by adverse possession must only be brought through an Originating Summons, if the issues therein were disputed, the superior court should have dealt with the matter as if the same had been begun by filing a plaint.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Ekaita v Republic (Criminal Appeal 25 of 1994) [1994] KECA 107 (KLR) (23 June 1994) (Judgment) Nebart Ekaita v Republic [1994] eKLR Neutral citation: [1994] KECA 107 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL 25 OF 1994 JM GACHUHI, JE GICHERU & RSC OMOLO, JJA JUNE 23, 1994 BETWEEN NEBART EKAITA .................................................................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ..................................................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
There was no evidence of service of the order 2. Neither the order nor the notice of motion nor any other notice in connection therewith that was served carried an indorsement of penal obligation or consequence.